Jump to Navigation

Patent Litigation

Many business owners believe that a patent offers complete protection against infringement. However, when a patent is threatened, patent holders must take more drastic measures to protect their interests. Patent litigation includes legal actions to protect patents against infringement, and may result in monetary damages or an injunction against the infringement.

Patent infringement occurs when another party makes, uses, or sells a patented item without the permission of the patent holder. The patent holder may chose to sue the infringing party to stop his or her activities, as well as to receive compensation for the unauthorized use. Since intellectual property is governed by federal law, the patent holder must sue the unauthorized party in federal district court. Patent holders may only recover damages for any infringement committed within the six years prior to the filing of the infringement action. While technically there is no statute of limitations barring suit, if the infringing act only occurred more than six years before the claim of infringement is made, then there is no viable or remedial case or controversy to be heard because no monetary or injunctive relief is available. While patent litigation proceeds much like any other federal trial, the complicated legal issues surrounding patent validity and infringement are reserved for the court's determination, although some patent litigation use juries for other aspects of the overall case.

The alleged infringer typically counters the patent holder's suit by alleging that the patent is not valid. Patents are invalid if the holder included fraudulent information in the US Patent and Trademark Office application, if the patent resulted from anticompetitive business activities, or if the alleged infringer can show that the patent did not meet the requirements of novelty and non-obviousness, which is required for patent protection. Novelty requires that the invention be entirely new, while non-obviousness means that the invention cannot be a variation or an obvious improvement of an existing invention.

The patent holder bears the burden of proof to show that the defendant infringed the patent. The plaintiff must prove infringement by a preponderance of the evidence. This standard requires that the evidence show that it is more likely than not that infringement occurred. There are several types of patent infringement. Direct infringement occurs when a product covered by a patent is manufactured without permission. The court may also find indirect infringement. An indirect infringer may induce infringement by encouraging or aiding another in infringing on a patent. Contributory infringement occurs when a party supplies a direct infringer with a part that has no substantial non-infringing use. Literal infringement exists if there is a direct correspondence between the words in the patent claims and the infringing device. Even if an invention does not infringe on the patent directly, indirectly, or literally; the court may still find infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. An invention that achieves substantially the same result in substantially the same way infringes the patent under this doctrine.

If the court finds infringement, it must still determine whether the infringement was willful. Willful infringement involves intentional disregard for another's patent rights. Willful infringement encompasses direct and intentional copying and continued infringement after notice. Patent users and inventors should employ patent attorneys to ensure that the use of a patent is valid and noninfringing. Even if infringement is found later, the attempt to secure a legal opinion is evidence that the infringement was not willful. If the court finds that the infringement was willful, the infringer may face a substantial financial penalty. A willful infringer may end up paying triple the amount of actual damages suffered by the patent holder, as well as the plaintiff's attorneys' fees.

When a court finds infringement, frequently the infringer is required to pay damages to the patent holder, either in the form of actual damages or a reasonable royalty for the unauthorized use. Actual damages include lost profits the patent holder would have realized but for the infringement, while a reasonable royalty depends on the type of product, other royalty arrangements, time remaining on the patent, and other issues. In addition to damages, the prevailing party is also entitled to costs. Costs include court filing fees and related litigation expenses.

In addition to infringement damages, a patent owner may stop the infringer from continuing to produce infringing products. The court typically issues a permanent injunction after the infringer is held liable for violating the patent. In some instances, the patent holder will seek a preliminary injunction at the outset of the lawsuit where he or she can show no detriment to the public interest if the injunction is granted, a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the case, and more compelling hardship for the patent holder if the infringer continues his or her activities while the case proceeds. The patent holder will find it difficult to get a preliminary injunction unless a prior adjudication proved the validity of the patent.

The combination of federal court jurisdiction, complicated subject matter, and technical underpinnings of patent law underscore the need of patent holders and accused infringers to obtain highly skilled legal representation. Patent attorneys can assist litigants in developing their cases and in securing aggressive litigation services.

Learn More: Reasons to Contact an Intellectual Property Attorney

To read and print out a copy of the checklist, please follow the link below.

Reasons to Contact an Intellectual Property Attorney

You can download a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader here

Copyright © 2008 FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business

DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent counsel for advice on any legal matter.

Archives

Tell Us About Your Case...

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
We Take A Little Different Approach From Other Law Firms

We pride ourselves on providing our clients with quality legal representation in the courtroom in a variety of areas, including cases that few other firms will handle... more...

For Current NY Estate Litigation News, Visit Our Blog
How Can We Help?

Greenfield Stein & Senior, LLP
600 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10016-1901
Tel: (212) 818-9600 Fax: (212) 818-1264

One North Lexington Avenue
White Plains, NY 10601
Tel: (914) 948-3070